Listen to this post

In September 2025, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), jointly with the Department of the Treasury, issued its Priority Guidance Plan (“Plan”) for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. In this Plan, the IRS signaled its intent to issue “[g]uidance on the application of the fundamental public policy against racial discrimination, including consideration of recent case law, in determining the eligibility of private schools for recognition of tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3).”

The IRS has followed through on this planned policy initiative. On September 3, 2026, the IRS issued proposed regulations that would update the nondiscrimination requirements for tax-exempt educational organizations, including private K-12 schools, colleges, and professional or trade schools. If approved, these proposed regulations would take effect on May 31, 2027.

The proposed rule would make clear that any policy or practice that discriminates on the basis of race, color, or national or ethnic origin, for any purpose, is ineligible for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. In proposing these changes, the IRS has cited its desire to align policies with Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 600 U.S. 181 (2023), in which the Supreme Court concluded that race-based admissions policies violate the Equal Protection Clause and Title VI regardless of remedial or diversity-related intent.

The consequences of losing tax-exempt status extend beyond the loss of the income tax exemption itself. Tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) also enables donors to claim charitable contribution deductions, supports access to tax-exempt bond financing, and often serves as a prerequisite for state and local tax exemptions, including property tax exemptions.

Current Rules and Proposed Changes

Tax-exempt educational organizations have long been prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin. Rev. Rul. 71-447 (1971). While rarely enforced, the Supreme Court affirmed in Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983), that institutions engaging in racial discrimination are ineligible for tax-exempt status because such discrimination violates fundamental public policy.

Since 1975, schools have been required to adopt and publicize a racially nondiscriminatory policy and to maintain records demonstrating nondiscriminatory practices across admissions, scholarships, athletics, and other programs. Existing rules provided “safe harbors” permitting race-conscious decision-making if the purpose and effect was to promote the school’s nondiscriminatory policy. The proposed regulations would eliminate these safe harbors. As a result, tax-exempt educational organizations should consider the following:

  • Identify and carefully review any policy, practice, or program that favors applicants, students, employees, alumni, or others participating in school programs on the basis of race, color, or national origin. Even policies adopted to promote diversity or remediate past discrimination may place the school’s tax-exempt status at risk.
  • Race-neutral criteria (including family income, geography, first-generation status, and academic achievement) remain permissible for admissions and financial aid decisions and other policies.
  • Identify whether the school administers any donor-established scholarship funds with race-based or nationality-based eligibility criteria and consider whether such scholarships may run afoul of the proposed regulations. In some cases, schools may need to work with those donors (or their successors) to revise the criteria consistent with the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act adopted by the applicable jurisdiction for such funds. Where donors are no longer available, modification of such restrictions may require court approval or involvement of the state Attorney General, depending on the governing jurisdiction.

What You Should Do Now

Tax-exempt schools are encouraged to consult with legal counsel regarding the impact these proposed rules may have on admissions policies and practices, scholarship programs, and other student-facing programs. Public comment through the rule-making process is available through the expected deadline of November 3, 2026. If you have questions, please reach out to a member of our team.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Julie C. Fay Julie C. Fay

Julie C. Fay represents a wide range of educational institutions, including k-12 public and independent schools and colleges and universities, in legal issues related to students, employees, governance, and policy. Her work also includes advising non-profit organizations such as camps and after school…

Julie C. Fay represents a wide range of educational institutions, including k-12 public and independent schools and colleges and universities, in legal issues related to students, employees, governance, and policy. Her work also includes advising non-profit organizations such as camps and after school programs, in addition to serving as independent counsel for organizational ombudsman programs for institutions of higher education and other organizations. Julie is a current member of Shipman’s Management Committee and former co-chair of the School Law Practice Group.

Photo of Melissa Mack Melissa Mack

As chair of Shipman’s Tax Exempt Organizations Practice Group, Melissa Mack represents large and small tax-exempt organizations on tax-exemption, corporate and governance issues, providing practical and well-rounded counsel to our nonprofit clients. She represents public charities, private foundations, educational institutions, community foundations, hospitals…

As chair of Shipman’s Tax Exempt Organizations Practice Group, Melissa Mack represents large and small tax-exempt organizations on tax-exemption, corporate and governance issues, providing practical and well-rounded counsel to our nonprofit clients. She represents public charities, private foundations, educational institutions, community foundations, hospitals and healthcare organizations, social service agencies, religious, cultural and performing arts organizations, supporting organizations, quasi-governmental entities and trade associations across multiple industries.

Melissa counsels clients on forming nonstock corporations, obtaining, maintaining and operating in furtherance of tax-exempt status, strategic planning and corporate transactions. She provides guidance to organizations and boards of directors on corporate governance, regulatory compliance, contracting, affiliations, mergers, dissolution, fiduciary duties, board disputes, policy and procedure development, unrelated business income taxes, executive compensation, intermediate sanctions matters, private foundation excise taxes, conflicts of interest, endowments, advocacy, lobbying limitations, fiscal sponsorships, charitable giving, grantmaking, fundraising, gift acceptance, corporate sponsorships, charitable solicitations and donor relations.

Photo of Deanna McWeeney Deanna McWeeney

Deanna McWeeney is an associate in the firm’s Tax and Employee Benefits practice group. She has experience in general legal matters, contracts, negotiations, tax planning, audit defense, mergers and acquisitions, and other related transactions.

Photo of Tom Owen Tom Owen

Tom Owen works with schools and colleges on legal issues related to students, employees, governance, and policy. He draws on his previous career in education to offer practical legal guidance to school leaders. Tom holds a J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law…

Tom Owen works with schools and colleges on legal issues related to students, employees, governance, and policy. He draws on his previous career in education to offer practical legal guidance to school leaders. Tom holds a J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law, an M.A. in private school leadership from the Klingenstein Center for Independent School Leadership at Columbia University’s Teachers College, and an A.B. in comparative literature from Dartmouth College.