Although the 2018 legislative session of the Connecticut General Assembly ended with the adoption of bipartisan budget legislation, it was marked by a continued failure to conduct a more holistic review of the state’s sources of expense and revenue.  Such a review was invited by the 2015 report of the State Tax Panel and the more recent report of the Commission on Fiscal Stability and Economic Growth, but there seemed to be little appetite for debate on the subject in this gubernatorial election year.  Instead, the General Assembly appointed yet another tax panel, this time to study the Commission’s recommendations, and authorized the hiring of a national consultant to generate recommendations regarding efficiency improvements in revenue collection and agency expense management that will somehow result in savings of $500 million without adversely impacting program quality or social services program benefits.

Nevertheless, the 2018 session did generate significant Connecticut tax legislation, largely in reaction to the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.  Like many jurisdictions with a state income tax, Connecticut sought to counteract the new federal income tax limitation on the ability of individuals to take an itemized deduction for certain state and local taxes.  The General Assembly enacted a new tax on pass-through businesses, such as Subchapter S corporations and limited liability companies, and other entities taxed as partnerships for federal income tax purposes.  The Legislature also authorized each Connecticut municipality to establish a community support organization that can accept charitable contributions for the benefit of the municipality and be the basis for a credit against the municipality’s property tax.  As discussed in this Alert, the efficacy of these attempts at federal tax relief may be limited based upon current and future federal and state guidance. In addition, Connecticut, together with other states, instituted a lawsuit challenging the new federal limitation on the deduction of state and local taxes.

Tax revenue collected by the state in late 2017 and early 2018, largely as the result of a federal law change related to the taxation of foreign source income, did allow Connecticut to address its current fiscal year budget issues and meaningfully replenish the state’s “rainy day” fund.  However, the projection of significant future budget deficits caused the General Assembly to enact legislation de-coupling state tax law from a number of the most favorable provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, including 100% bonus depreciation and the asset expensing rules under Internal Revenue Code §179.  On a more positive note, for individuals, a new subtraction modification is established for the personal income tax for certain income earned by new venture capital funds that invest in Connecticut bioscience businesses, and the rules governing withholding on payments from pensions and annuities are clarified.  Corporations are subject to a new rule that deems the amount of non-deductible expenses related to dividends to be equal to five percent of a corporation’s dividends.  As part of the state’s ongoing attempt to impose nexus for Connecticut sales and use tax purposes on out-of-state retailers, the General Assembly has redefined what constitutes “engaged in business in the state” and imposed new state tax obligations on what are termed “market facilitators” (e.g., businesses that create a forum for sales, such as on the Internet) and “referrers” (e.g., businesses that create a forum for the listing or advertising of property or services for sale).  The subsequent decision of the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., however, likely will permit Connecticut to more directly impose sales tax collection, remission and reporting obligations on remote sellers. The Office of Fiscal Analysis has estimated that Connecticut will realize an additional $40 million annually in sales and use tax receipts as a result of the Wayfair decision.

Governor-elect Ned Lamont has yet to announce his nominee for Commissioner of Revenue Services.  Although revenues in the current fiscal year are projected to result in a $278.6 million surplus and a further transfer to the State’s rainy day fund of $648 million, the Office of Fiscal Analysis is still projecting a multi-billion dollar deficit for the next biennium, setting the stage for another difficult budget legislative session commencing in January 2019.

Download: Printable PDF

This Alert summarizes Connecticut tax legislation enacted, court decisions rendered and administrative guidance published by the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services during the first ten months of 2018. Please contact a member of our State and Local Tax Practice Group if you have questions regarding the new tax law changes or how they may affect you and your business. On June 12, 2018, our tax attorneys hosted a CLE Webinar on the Connecticut response to the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, including the new pass-through entity tax. Visit our CLE Knowledge Center or click here and register to view this presentation on demand.

Photo of David O. Bigger David O. Bigger

David Bigger practices primarily in the areas of international, federal, state and local taxation, with particular emphasis on personal income tax, mergers and acquisitions, and matters involving the taxation of partnerships.  David has represented individuals and companies with regard to multi-state taxation issues, tax planning, reorganizations, enforcement and collection defense, and other federal and state tax controversies.

Photo of Ray Casella Ray Casella

Ray practices in all areas of federal, state and local tax law. He has extensive experience representing tax-exempt organizations including schools, private foundations and public charities. Ray regularly deals with federal and state income tax issues, Connecticut sales and use tax issues, federal and state payroll tax issues, and private foundation excise taxes.

Photo of Robert L. Day, III Robert L. Day, III

Robert is a member of the Tax and Employee Benefits Practice Group and practices primarily in the areas of federal, state and local taxation.  Robert regularly counsels a wide variety of taxpayers including individuals, manufacturers, insurers, media companies, financial institutions, hedge funds, and asset management funds.  He also has experience representing these clients in tax controversies before the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services and other taxing authorities.

Photo of Alan E. Lieberman Alan E. Lieberman

Alan Lieberman is Chair of the firm’s seven-person Management Committee and acts as the firm’s Managing Partner.

Alan’s practice involves counseling clients on matters involving international, federal, state and local taxation, and representing them in tax-related disputes in administrative and court proceedings. In addition, Alan represents clients in the formation, reorganization, and liquidation of business entities and tax-exempt organizations.

Photo of Louis B. Schatz Louis B. Schatz

Louis Schatz serves as Chair of Shipman & Goodwin’s Tax and Employee Benefits Practice Group. From 2007 to 2017, Lou served on the firm’s seven-person Management Committee. He is the past Chair of the Tax Section of the Connecticut Bar Association.

Lou practices in the areas of federal and State of Connecticut tax with attention to the representation of closely held businesses organized as limited liability companies, partnerships and S corporations; real estate joint ventures; and the representation of taxpayers involved in federal and Connecticut tax controversies (at the audit, appellate and court levels). He is a frequent lecturer on federal and State of Connecticut tax, partnership and limited liability company issues.